|
In addition to our recruiting
services, we have also developed a reputation
as a respected source for expert witness services
relating to employment issues. We can provide
research, analyses, and expert testimony in
cases regarding employment disputes. Our past
work with clients has involved the defense of
restrictive covenants vs. right-to-work claims,
the development of exhibits related to "whistle
blower" actions, the mitigation of damages
arising from wrongful discharge lawsuits, the
generation of industry-based "market worth"
documentation, and the evaluation of past job
markets and production of historical help-wanted
listings. Whether your legal battle is in an
Ohio hall of justice, or before the Department
of Labor in Washington, our research and unique
knowledge form an opinion that is valued by
attorneys and courts alike. Below are some of
the cases we've been involved in:
 Wm.
Bush & Carrier Corporation vs. Copeland
Corporation (1989)
Various
vs. NCR Corporation (1989)
Ernst
& Young Case (1993, Hamilton County)
Mosbaugh
vs. Georgia Power Company (1996)
Mr. Mosbaugh, a general manager with
Georgia Power Company (GPC), was released for
cause in 1989. Mr. Mosbaugh pursued a wrongful
discharge suit through the Department of Labor.
The Secretary of Labor (Robert Reich) determined
that GPC was guilty. Mosbaugh remained continuously
employed through June 1996.
Executive Search, Ltd. was engaged during the
damage phase to determine:
a. if Mosbaugh
expended reasonable effort that a prudent individual
would in this job search
b. if Mosbaugh
expended reasonable effort could he have been
employed and at what level and income.
Executive Search, Ltd. conducted a market analysis
of the ads available circa 1989 through 1995
in various publications to which Mosbaugh had
easy access. Also, a salary survey was conducted
and an analysis of Mosbaugh's documented efforts.
Executive Search, Ltd. determined Mosbaugh had
not expended reasonable effort in his search
to find suitable employment after being terminated
from Georgia Power. The analysis showed that
Mosbaugh could have been employed at comparable
money within a reasonable time of his termination.
Upon release of Executive Search, Ltd.'s study,
Mosbaugh then moved to settle within three months
of the hearing after seven years of refusing
to do so. (John Lamberski, Esq.; Troutman, Sanders,
LLP; Atlanta, GA)
Brooks
vs. Martin Marietta Energy Services (MMES),
1996)
Marvin
B. Hobby vs. Georgia Power Company (GPC), (1996,
1997)
|
